I submitted the project to the IRB, contextualizing the experiment in terms of psychological and artistic precedents. The IRB rejected the study on the grounds that it was unethical, unsafe, may incite coercion, and would not produce meaningful information. Over the course of five correspondences, I discussed with the IRB whether or not I was producing meaningful information, whether or not the machine was safe, whether or not I was qualified to conduct the research, and whether or not I was infringing upon participant autonomy. The IRB was incapable, or unwilling, to consider my work in terms of artistic criteria. They decided that my open-ended, participatory installation would lead to coercive social behaviors, but refused to discuss whether restricting my artwork was itself a form of coercion. While the IRB insisted that “future displays restrict individuals from using the device in any manner,” subsequent displays have remained interactive.